3 People Who Make Outstanding Creative Contributions to the Arts or Sciences Are Most Likely to

Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Apr-Jun; lx(ii): 168–174.

Creativity and psychopathology: Two sides of the same coin?

Indla Ramasubba Reddy

¹Director, VIMHANS, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Jateen Ukrani

ⁱⁱDepartment of Psychiatry, Deep Chand Bandhu Infirmary, Delhi, India

Vishal Indla

ⁱⁱⁱChief Psychiatrist, VIMHANS, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Varsha Ukrani

⁴Section of Psychiatry, Pt Madan Mohan Malviya Hospital, Delhi, India

Abstract

The Mad Genius is a recurring stereotype of contemporary cultural expression, and many famous personalities and creators accept suffered from psychopathology. Inventiveness and genius may be a sought-after trait; however, it is likewise commonly believed to be associated with psychopathology. This has been examined, starting with Lombroso'due south investigation of genius and madness in 1800s followed by a dearth of literature debating the association betwixt the two. This prove for this polarizing outcome ranges from psychometric to neuroscientific disciplines and creates ambivalence neither refuting nor accepting this association completely. Through this article, nosotros briefly review the literature on this subject and effort to decipher what is written in between the lines, how creativity and psychopathology may fuel each other, and what may be its clinical implications.

Keywords: Inventiveness, mad genius, psychopathology

INTRODUCTION

The idea that creativity and psychopathology are somehow linked goes way dorsum to antiquity to the time of Aristotle, who famously stated that "No great heed has existed without a bear on of madness."[1] Centuries afterwards, this belief has been expanded past various psychiatrists. Lombroso, a renowned forensic psychiatrist, argued toward the end of the nineteen^th century that genius and madness were closely connected manifestations of an underlying degenerative neurological disorder.[2] This is synonymous with the common observation that though creativity is most sought-later trait in fields as varied every bit business, the arts, science, and sports, and still, there is a long list of eminent artistic achievers who have suffered from psychopathology. The list includes prominent comedian Robin Williams, creative creators similar Vincent Van Gogh, Robert Schumann, Mozart, Beethoven, Sylvia Plath, Virginia Woolf, Anne Sexton, Ernest Hemingway, Edgar Allan Poe, Michelangelo, Georgia O'Keefe, and Jackson Pollock.[3] Fifty-fifty when John Nash, who suffered from schizophrenia was asked "Why did you believe that yous were appointed by aliens to save the world??" he answered "Because the ideas virtually supernatural things came to me the aforementioned way as did the mathematical solutions! And so I took them seriously!!" Despite all the associations, in that location is a contend whether the two are linked and has divided the scientific community for decades. The prevailing view tends to tilt toward that psychopathology and creativity are probably positively associated.[iv] But what is the scientific prove supporting this association? How common is psychopathology in creative persons? What are its implications in clinical practice? It is to these questions that we at present plough.

DEFINING CREATIVITY

Inventiveness may be merely defined as the act of turning new and imaginative ideas into reality.[5] Even so, more than 60 definitions exist for inventiveness in psychology, literature, and no unmarried definition has uniform acceptance.[half-dozen] Dietrich identifies the four dissimilar types of creativity with corresponding different brain activities.[7]

Deliberate and cognitive: Kind of creativity that comes from sustained work in a field of study. For case, Thomas Edison, the inventor of the electrical calorie-free bulb, was a deliberate and cognitive creator. He ran experiment later experiment before he would come up with an invention
Deliberate and emotional: A personal crisis leading to a realization about yourself and what bad choices or decisions you might have made that contributed to the problem is deliberate, emotional creativity, for example, a relationship breakdown, losing a job, going through bankruptcy, so realizing what was your error that atomic number 82 to the problem
Spontaneous and cognitive: A sudden realization about how to staff the project, for example, Isaac Newton and Discovery of gravity afterward apple cruel on his head from tree
Spontaneous and emotional: The kind of creativity exhibited by great artists and musicians who can produce great work of arts inside minutes.

In add-on, the componential model of creativity stated that four components are necessary for any creative response: iii components within the individual – noesis (domain relevant skills), creative thinking (how people approach problems/personality traits), and motivation (intrinsic passion or interest in the work itself) and 1 component exterior the individual – the social environment in which the private is working.[8] What information technology substantially ways is that surroundings may besides influence creativity in a like way information technology influences psychopathology.

INTELLIGENCE AND Inventiveness

The relationship between intelligence and creativity has been subject to scientific research for decades. The most important notion linking intelligence and creativity is the threshold hypothesis, which presumes that higher up average intelligence is a necessity for high-level creativity. According to this hypothesis, there is a correlation betwixt intelligence and creativity up to 120 intelligence quotient (IQ) points, and after that, the clan fades off gradually.[9] Earlier enquiry seemed to take supported this hypothesis;[10,11] nevertheless, contempo research is discrediting it by further examining inventiveness at dissimilar conceptual levels. 1 of the almost general conceptual distinctions delineated by modern creativity research is the ane betwixt creative potential and artistic achievement.[12] Creative potential refers to the individual's power to generate something novel and useful[13] whereas creative achievement refers to the actual realization of this potential regarding existent-life accomplishments (such as having fabricated a scientific discovery and written a novel).[14] Recent research has shown that artistic potential may exist dependent on IQ; withal, artistic achievement is independent of IQ. Hence, even people with depression IQ may perform and attain something creatively.[xv]

TRUTH OR MYTH: THE EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

Scientific evidence linking the ii comes from three types of research: (a) historiometric studies of prominent creators from our by; (b) psychiatric studies of the present-mean solar day creators based on clinical diagnoses; and (c) psychometric studies of modernistic creators by application of established cess methods.

Historiometric research

In this type of research, biographies of prominent creators were systematically analyzed to detect the presence of symptoms similar with various psychopathological syndromes and came to four main conclusions:

The rate and intensity of psychopathological symptoms normally announced to be college among prominent creators than in the general population,[16,17] and estimation is that highly creative artists are about ii times as likely to experience some psychiatric disorder every bit compared to noncreative individuals.[xviii] Low is the virtually common trouble faced by these artistic individuals, along with the correlates of alcoholism and suicide[xix,20,21]
Ludwig suggested that on the average, the more eminent the creator, the higher is the expected charge per unit, and intensity[18]
The charge per unit and intensity of symptoms may vary according to the specific domain of creativity, i.eastward., it may be different for scientists and writers.[22] For example, studies suggest that almost 87% of famous poets experienced some form of psychopathology as compared to only 28% of the eminent scientists which is closer to the rates in general population[17,ane,22]
The family lines which produce the most prominent creators also tend to exist characterized past a higher rate and intensity of psychopathological symptoms.[23,24]

Psychiatric research

Research focuses on the incidence of clinical diagnosis and therapeutic treatment in samples of present-day creators. Akin to historiometric studies, psychiatric inquiry also suggests a higher rate and intensity of symptoms among distinguished creators especially those engaged in artistic inventiveness.[25,26] Low, alcoholism, and suicide once more appear to be the most common psychopathological bug faced by these creators. Furthermore, the evidence points that inventiveness and mental disease runs in the same family lines farther consolidating the testify from historiometric research.[27,28]

Psychometric research

In these types of studies, standard assessment instruments are applied to mod-day creative individuals. The psychometric measures include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. In general, highly creative individuals scored above normal on several dimensions associated with psychopathology,[29] but post-obit two master findings stand out.

Although highly creative individuals have a tendency to show elevated scores on some psychopathological symptoms, their scores are seldom so high as to represent articulate-cut and sterling psychopathology. Instead, their scores may prevarication somewhere between the normal and aberrant ranges[12,29]
Artistic individuals score high on many other characteristics that may dampen the furnishings of psychopathological symptoms. In particular, creators may brandish high levels of ego-strength and self-sufficiency.[29,30] In addition, they tin can exert metacognitive command over their psychopathological symptoms, taking advantage of bizarre thoughts to create rather than having the bizarre thoughts take advantage of them.

Psychometric research emphasizes that eminent creators may lie on the same spectrum of psychopathological syndromes, but may display a less astringent form of it, and hence, using it to their benefit; this finding is unlike from psychiatric and historiometric studies and forces us to sympathize the link further through neuroscience of inventiveness.

NEUROSCIENCE OF CREATIVITY AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

Neuroscience can approach this written report in two means: first, through brain imaging to study the cognitive mechanisms that may be commonly shared betwixt creativity and psychopathology. Second, through molecular biology to identify the genetic variations that may underlie both creativity and psychopathology.

Brain imaging studies

Conventional research and overly simplistic notions surrounding the neuroscience of inventiveness accept stated that the correct side of the brain is responsible for inventiveness, passion, sensuality, and being poetic whereas left side of the brain is responsible for logical associations; however, recent literature has contradicted these findings. While creative cognition is in the process, three large-scale encephalon networks from both hemispheres are utilized and this is disquisitional to agreement the neuroscience of creativity. Depending on the stage of the creative process, and what you're actually attempting to create, networks from different brain regions are recruited to handle the chore.[31]

Network ane: The Executive Attention Network (outer prefrontal cortex + parietal lobe)
Network 2: The Imagination Network (deep PFC + temporal lobe + parietal lobe)
Network three: The Salience Network (dorsal inductive cingulate cortices [dACC] + inductive insula [AI]).

For creativity, it is good to reduce the activation of the Executive Attention Network (a bit, but not completely) and to increment the activation of the Imagination and Salience Networks.[31] While this explains the origins of creativity in the brain, it does not emphasize how psychopathology may underlie or overlap with creativity.

More interesting phenomenon is the link between creativity and latent inhibition. Carson et al. pointed out that latent inhibition is a filtering mechanism to screen irrelevant stimuli[32] that we share with other animals, and it is tied to the neurotransmitter dopamine.[33] Enquiry has consistently shown that depression-latent inhibition was associated with loftier creative achievement, creative personality, and originality facet of divergent thinking. It is probably latent inhibition that makes a person artistic while the above networks are recruited to generate novel ideas.

To aid usa understand this let the states consider the following examples:

Normal people with boilerplate latent inhibition will concentrate only on chore at hand
Attending-deficit hyperactivity disorder will concentrate on all the irrelevant stimuli rather than the task at hand
People and artists with depression-latent inhibition can concentrate on relevant and irrelevant tasks together and become more creative associating the two.

Carson et al.[32] pointed out that the well-nigh eminent creative achievers were vii times more likely to accept reduced latent inhibition equally shown in Figure 1, only research past Kaufman and Paul et al. and Lubow et al. also testify a link between reduced latent inhibition and psychopathological syndrome of acute-phase schizophrenia.[34,35] This overlap of reduced latent inhibition between eminent creators and acute phase schizophrenia may aid us understand the results of psychometric enquiry in amend light which keeps them on the aforementioned spectrum.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is IJPsy-60-168-g001.jpg

Adjusted from Carson et al. 2003[32]

Genetic studies

The molecular genetics approach in this domain is already undergoing and studies by Reuter et al., Mayseless et al. and Kéri betoken polymorphisms of the DRD2 and DRD4 genes,[36,37] interest of the 5HT2a gene[38] and the NRG1 factor[39] that have been establish linked to both creativity and some forms of psychopathology. Potential areas of further research are suggested by shared vulnerability framework of creativity and psychopathology as discussed past Carson.[40,41] The shared vulnerability model implies that creativity and psychopathology may have common genetically influenced factors that may exist expressed every bit either psychopathology or creativity depending on the presence or absence of other protective factors such as high IQ, cerebral flexibility, practiced working retentivity, and risk factors such every bit low IQ and working memory deficits. The shared vulnerability factors that have been recognized include novelty salience, neural hyperconnectivity, and emotional lability in addition to cognitive disinhibition as shown in Figure 2.[40,41] Of these, inquiry into novelty salience has shown some link between creativity and psychopathology. Novelty salience is associated with the motivation to explore new and singled-out aspects of ideas or objects by leveraging the dopamine advantage system. Research by McCrae, Reuter et al., and Flaherty has shown that novelty-seeking is associated with creative personality,[42,43] creative drive[44] only also addiction. Other vulnerability attributes such every bit emotional lability and neural hyper connectivity have been linked to creativity in mood disorders and schizophrenia, respectively, just their association is poorly understood and needs more research.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is IJPsy-60-168-g002.jpg

Shared vulnerability framework of creativity and psychopathology (source: Carson[forty,41])

PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS AND CREATIVITY

Until now, we have discussed how psychopathology and inventiveness are linked in full general and the mechanisms that may exist involved in their association. Now, nosotros motion on to run into how this clan fares for various distinct psychopathological syndromes individually.

Mood disorders

At that place is widespread conventionalities that mania is a source of creativity and is vividly exemplified by the worldwide release of many way products ranging from perfumes to goggles, which may be named "Mania." Though pop beliefs are not always supported past empirical findings; however, this 1's an exception with there existence a potent connection betwixt mood disorders and artistic creativity. Research into this area has suggested that subjects with cyclothymia and first-caste relatives of subjects with manic depression had college creativity scores than controls. Goodwin and Jamison, who studied biographical materials reported that bipolar disorder may take afflicted many eminent creators like John Berryman, Robert Lowell, Anne Sexton, Vincent van Gogh, and Robert Schumann, amid others.[45,46] Akin to this several other biographical studies like one by Ludwig of over thousand creators have provided consistent bear witness for elevated rates of bipolar disorder in samples of famous individuals.[47] Studies by Andreasen using structured diagnostic interviews to assess creative writers attending the highly prestigious University of Iowa Author's Workshop showed that 43% of 30 participants were found to meet criteria for bipolar spectrum disorders, as compared to ten% of a noncreative control grouping of persons matched for age, gender, and didactics.[27] While the link is consistent, several studies suggest that creativity is particularly probable among those with either mild forms of bipolar disorder[26,48,49] or family histories of bipolar disorder[23] as opposed to full-diddled bipolar I disorder, a finding consistent with historiometric studies discussed previously.

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders

The link between schizophrenia spectrum disorders and inventiveness is glorified past the Noble Winning genius John Nash and his struggles with schizophrenia. Nonetheless, show suggests two important findings: one that he might be an exception as but elevated level of schizotypy and psychosis-proneness found in divergent thinkers or possessing some indicators of schizotypy promotes artistic achievement but non full-diddled schizophrenia and two that overlapping processes may be implicated in both inventiveness and proneness toward psychosis. Equally discussed earlier, i important feature of inventiveness is its novelty or originality and schizophrenic thoughts are more than likely to exist different, original or novel. Hence, schizophrenia past its very nature predisposes toward satisfying one important prerequisite for creative thinking, namely originality. What may distinguish the artist is that they will exist able to organize better the flood of novel ideas, choosing ones with more utility and develop them efficiently while disposing others which may not be the case for schizophrenics. This corresponds to the oft-quoted remark by two-time Nobel laureate Linus Pauling who said that: "The way to get practiced ideas is to become lots of ideas and throw the bad ones away." Research into this clan by Karksson and Kinney et al. suggests that psychologically healthy biological relatives of schizophrenics accept unusually artistic jobs or hobbies and may bear witness higher levels of schizotypal personality traits in comparing to the full general population[24,fifty] and Sass suggests that Creative achievement more likely with 1-ii indicators of Schizotypy as shown in Figure 3 which is consistent with similar findings for mood disorders. Discussing it farther requires united states of america to empathize that schizotypal traits can be divided into two types "Positive" schizotypy traits which are unusual perceptual experiences, sparse mental boundaries betwixt self and other, impulsive nonconformity, magical beliefs, and "Negative" schizotypal traits which are cerebral disorganization, physical, and social anhedonia (difficulty experiencing pleasure from social interactions and activities that are usually enjoyable for majority of people). Of the 2 types[51] Batey and Furnham[52] found that the positive dimension of schizotypy consisting of unusual experiences and impulsive nonconformity, merely non the negative disorganization dimension, were significantly correlated to rating self as creative and a creative personality. A look into the neuroscience aspect of this link reveals that the more creative the person, the more than difficulty they had in suppressing the precuneus while performing an effortful working retentivity task or activity. The precuneus is the surface area of the default network[53,54,55] that is active during rest (when a person is not performing or focusing on an external job). Whitfield-Gabrieli et al.[56] found a similar difficulty to conciliate the precuneus amidst schizophrenics and their close relatives. This suggests that the key to artistic thinking in such individuals may exist unlocking the floodgates of their heed and letting every bit much data in as possible because sometimes the almost bizarre and distant associations can plow into the most brilliant creative ideas in our heed. This idea is consistent with recent enquiry on latent inhibition which has been discussed earlier and that schizotypy is associated with exact and creative creativity.[57,58]

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is IJPsy-60-168-g003.jpg

Artistic achievement more likely with 1–2 indicators of Schizotypy (source: Sass[69])

Substance use disorders

While medical literature by and large takes a negative view on drug use, Beveridge and Yorston suggest that the reverse is true for the lay public and artists.[59] They prize drugs such as alcohol for its ability to brand new creative insights, and courageous drinking has long been associated with creative personality. Rather than existence a sign of personal declining, using drugs, and alcoholism is taken as evidence of artistic integrity. While studies on alcohol intoxication advise positive benefits on the artistic procedure,[sixty] studies on excessive alcohol intake in the long run provide more than mixed results similar to studies linking other psychiatric disorders with creativity. Ludwig's study on chiliad outstanding individuals who had their biographies published in the New York Times Volume Review from 1960 to 1990 found a general increase in alcohol corruption in artists and especially writers.[18,20] Like results were suggested past Mail service in his study of 291 earth famous men and 100 well-known prose and playwriters.[21,22] When Ludwig investigated the writers in his previous cohort specifically, booze use proved detrimental to productivity in over 75% of the sample, specially in the latter phases of their drinking careers and Ernest Hemingway may exist a good example of this phenomenon who managed to win a Nobel prize for literature during his days of intoxication, but later on in his life committed suicide.

Apart from alcohol many writers have as well been addicted to drugs like opium of which Charles Dickens is a bang-up example who lost his life partially because of being addicted to this drug.

Neurodevelopmental disorders

Although far fewer studies accept examined neurodevelopmental disorders than psychotic, substance use, and mood disorders in relation to creativity, in that location has been substantial interest in whether young patients with these disorders have artistic abilities surpassing their peers. The Savant phenomenon is interesting show for link betwixt autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and creativity every bit usually they are exceptional in ane or more than areas such as mathematics, memory or musical skills. Many studies by Pring et al.[61] accept demonstrated this and one written report by Campbell and Wang too reports increased incidence of sibling with ASD[62] in children choosing a technical major. Notwithstanding, the inquiry in this area is express.

INDIAN STUDIES ON CREATIVITY AND MENTAL HEALTH

Indian literature has reported depiction of link between Creativity and mental health in Movies similar Rockstar which emphasizes the popular cultural belief in Republic of india – a belief that deep pain enhances creativity and creative acts may actually help in healing the wounds.[63] Somasundaram studied the seeds of creativity in popular Indian poets Kannadasan and Poet Bharti who suffered from substance abuse and addiction.[64,65] There take been a handful of methodologically sound studies to clearly plant the relationship betwixt inventiveness and mental health in Republic of india. The most prominent study by Pavitra et al. examined the psychiatric morbidity stress profile, coping skills, and personality profile in creative versus noncreative populations. It corroborated the findings of before studies in 70s and 80s that at that place was no difference between creative and noncreative groups regarding mental illness and stress profile.[66] This may not be truthful when comparing the findings to western literature, which lead us to believe that more research is needed to study the link between two in Indian population.

Treatment AND CREATIVITY

No matter who begets the disease, it needs to be treated. This is of import considering those creative individuals may not seek treatment for their status as usually as regular individuals because of many reasons. A study of contour of musicians and writers by Pavitra et al.[66] constitute that very few of experimental artistic grouping had sought treatment because of the stigma of a famous artist contacting a psychiatrist would make them unpopular, the fear that taking neurotropic medicines would hinder their overall creativity, the pop notion that 1 has to exist "little mad" to be creative and idea that the creative people are better equipped than general population to cope with stressors. While most reasons may seem unimportant to the overall management of the creative customer it is important to sympathize that pharmacotherapy may alter, preserve, foster, or harm creativity in means that significantly influence the quality of life and personal recovery in these creative clients. Carson suggested that artistic patients may prefer to tolerate higher levels of mental symptoms in commutation for lower dosages of creativity-killing pharmaceuticals.[twoscore] Kyaga et al. pointed out that patients with bipolar disorders and schizophrenia may unremarkably discontinue medication due to complaints of inventiveness diminution and cognitive impairments caused by drug treatment.[67] While agents such as bupropion may increase creativity in a depressed only creative individual, agents such equally Lithium may flatten out inventiveness in bipolar artists and antipsychotics may non save negative symptoms in such patients.[68] Choosing a treatment line may exist challenging in such cases but cues from the shared genetic vulnerability model of inventiveness and mental disorders discussed before suggest that mental disorders in creative individuals perhaps reduced past treating symptoms associated with vulnerability factors and enhancing protective factors associated with inventiveness and enhancing overall creativity.[40] In full general, treatments tin can be roughly divided into ones that are creativity promoting and creativity killing. Thus, nonpharmacological approaches such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, fine art, creative writing, drama, or music therapy may, forth with redirecting patients interest into creative fields, reduce patients sufferings, and may yield a amend issue than not treating the client completely. Not treating an artist may besides be dangerous as nontreatment may lead to fatalities, for example, Ernest Hemingway left infirmary against advice and shot himself to decease.

Determination

The mad genius argue is a polarizing and divisive issue in the field of inventiveness research simply with the neuroscientific, psychometric, psychiatric, and historiometric evidence reviewed hither, information technology is likely that psychopathology and creativity are closely related; sharing many traits and antecedents only outright psychopathology may be negatively associated with creativity. Therefore, persons with full-diddled schizophrenia or booze dependence may not be creative but only milder forms of all illnesses may be conducive to creativity. Family members of psychiatric patients may display higher levels of creativity, findings that are consistent in studies across all psychiatric disorders. Another important finding from these studies is that persons with low IQ may perform and achieve something creatively and that IQ simply determines the potential but not the possibility of creative accomplishment. This finding challenges mutual belief that low IQ individuals may not be capable of any achievements. While many artistic individuals may experience stigmatized and ignore their psychological condition, information technology is of import to treat them to prevent adverse outcomes and overall reduction in their creativity during their lifespan. Controlling for their treatment should be individualized and tailor made rather than one size fits all arroyo.69

Financial support and sponsorship

Cipher.

Conflicts of interest

In that location are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

i. Becker G. The association of creativity and psychopathology: Its cultural-historical origins. Creat Res J. 2001;thirteen:45–53. [Google Scholar]

2. Lombroso C. The Man of Genius. London, England: W. Scott; 1891. [Google Scholar]

three. Jamison K. Touched with Burn down. New York, NY: Costless Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]

four. Durrenberger SD. Encyclopedia of Inventiveness. In: Runco M, Pritzker Southward, editors. Mad genius controversy. Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999. pp. 169–77. [Google Scholar]

half dozen. Taylor CW, Sternberg RJ. Various approaches to and definitions of creativity The Nature of Creativity: Gimmicky Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland: Cambridge University press; 1988. [Google Scholar]

vii. Dietrich A. The cognitive neuroscience of inventiveness. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004;eleven:1011–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Amabile TM. Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J of Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45:997–1013. [Google Scholar]

ix. Guilford JP. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967. The Nature of Human Intelligence. [Google Scholar]

10. Getzels JW, Jackson PW. Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. Oxford, England: Wiley; 1962. [Google Scholar]

11. Barron F, Harrington DM. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annu Rev Psychol. 1981;32:439–76. [Google Scholar]

12. Eysenck HJ. Genius: The Natural History of Inventiveness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Academy Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]

13. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI. Vol. ane. Cambridge, United kingdom: Cambridge Academy press; 1999. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms Handbook of Creativity; pp. three–15. [Google Scholar]

14. Carson SH, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. Reliability, validity, and factor construction of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creat Res J. 2005;17:37–50. [Google Scholar]

15. Jauk E, Benedek M, Dunst B, Neubauer AC. The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis past ways of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence. 2013;41:212–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

xvi. Ellis H. A Study of British Genius. Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1926. [Google Scholar]

17. Raskin Due east. Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical written report of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1936;31:twenty. [Google Scholar]

eighteen. Ludwig AM. The Price of Greatness: Resolving the Creativity and Madness Controversy. New York, USA: Guilford Printing; 1995. [Google Scholar]

nineteen. Goertzel MG, Goertzel V, Goertzel TG. 300 Eminent Personalities: A Psychosocial Analysis of the Famous San. Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1978. [Google Scholar]

twenty. Ludwig AM. Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creat Res J. 1998;11:93–101. [Google Scholar]

21. Mail F. Exact inventiveness, low and alcoholism. An investigation of one hundred American and British writers. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168:545–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Mail F. Creativity and psychopathology. A study of 291 globe-famous men. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;165:22–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Juda A. The human relationship between highest mental capacity and psychic abnormalities. Am J Psychiatry. 1949;106:296–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Karksson JL. Genetic association of giftedness and inventiveness with schizophrenia. Hereditas. 1970;66:177–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Andreasen NJ, Canter A. The creative author: Psychiatric symptoms and family history. Compr Psychiatry. 1974;15:123–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Jamison KR. Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry. 1989;52:125–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Andreasen NC. Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-caste relatives Eminent Inventiveness, Everyday Creativity, and Health. Greenwich, CT: Ablex publishing corporation; 1997. pp. 7–18. [Google Scholar]

28. Myerson A, Boyle RD. The incidence of manic-depressive psychosis in sure socially important families: Preliminary report. Am J Psychiatry. 1941;98:11–21. [Google Scholar]

29. Barron F. Buffalo, NY, US: Creative Instruction Foundation Press; 1990. Inventiveness and Psychological Wellness: Origins of Personal Vitality and Creative Freedom. [Google Scholar]

xxx. Cattell RB, Butcher HJ. The Prediction of Achievement and Creativity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1968. [Google Scholar]

31. Kaufman SB. The real neuroscience of creativity. Sci Amer. 2013 [Google Scholar]

32. Carson SH, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in loftier-functioning individuals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:499–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Lubow R, Weiner I, editors. Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia. Cambridge, Uk: Cambridge University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]

34. Kaufman SB, Paul ES. Creativity and schizophrenia spectrum disorders across the arts and sciences. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1145. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Lubow RE, Ingberg-Sachs Y, Zalstein-Orda N, Gewirtz JC. Latent inhibition in low and high "psychotic-prone" normal subjects. Pers Individ Differ. 1992;xiii:563–72. [Google Scholar]

36. Reuter M, Roth South, Holve Thousand, Hennig J. Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A airplane pilot written report. Brain Res. 2006;1069:190–vii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Mayseless Due north, Uzefovsky F, Shalev I, Ebstein RP, Shamay-Tsoory SG. The clan betwixt inventiveness and 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 factor (DRD4) Front end Hum Neurosci. 2013;vii:502. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Ott U, Reuter M, Hennig J, Vaitl D. Evidence for a common biological basis of the absorption trait, hallucinogen furnishings, and positive symptoms: Epistasis between 5-HT2a and COMT polymorphisms. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005;137B:29–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Kéri S. Genes for psychosis and creativity: A promoter polymorphism of the neuregulin ane cistron is related to inventiveness in people with high intellectual achievement. Psychol Sci. 2009;xx:1070–three. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

forty. Carson SH. Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56:144–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Carson S. Neurosci Creat. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 175; 2013. Creativity and psychopathology: Shared neurocognitive. [Google Scholar]

42. McCrae RR. Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagin Cogn Pers. 1993;xiii:39–55. [Google Scholar]

43. Reuter M, Panksepp J, Schnabel N, Kellerhoff N, Kempel P, Hennig J. Personality and biological markers of inventiveness. Eur J Pers. 2005;19:83–95. [Google Scholar]

44. Flaherty AW. Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative bulldoze. J Comp Neurol. 2005;493:147–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. New york, USA: Oxford University Press; 2007. Manic-Depressive Affliction: Bipolar Disorders and Recurrent Depression. [Google Scholar]

46. Rothenberg A. Bipolar disease, creativity, and handling. Psychiatr Q. 2001;72:131–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Ludwig AM. Creative accomplishment and psychopathology: Comparison among professions. Am J Psychother. 1992;46:330–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Czeizel Eastward. Budapest: GMR Advertising Bureau; 2001. Who Wants to be a Poet, Should he go to Hell? Physical and Psychological Disorders of Hungarian Poetic Geniuses. [Google Scholar]

49. Wills GI. Forty lives in the bebop business: Mental wellness in a group of eminent jazz musicians. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:255–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

fifty. Kinney DK, Richards R, Lowing PA, LeBlanc D, Zimbalist ME, Harlan P. Inventiveness in offspring of schizophrenic and control parents: An adoption report. Creat Res J. 2001;13:17–25. [Google Scholar]

51. Nettle D. Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. J Res Pers. 2006;40:876–xc. [Google Scholar]

52. Batey Thousand, Furnham A. The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Pers Individ Differ. 2008;45:816–21. [Google Scholar]

53. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The encephalon's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to affliction. Ann Due north Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Jung RE, Mead BS, Carrasco J, Flores RA. The structure of artistic cognition in the human brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;seven:330. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Andrews-Hanna JR, Smallwood J, Spreng RN. The default network and cocky-generated thought: Component processes, dynamic command, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1316:29–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Thermenos HW, Milanovic Due south, Tsuang MT, Faraone SV, McCarley RW, et al. Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in get-go-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1279–84. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Del Giudice G, Angeleri R, Brizio A, Elena MR. The evolution of autistic-similar and schizotypal traits: A sexual pick hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2010;1:41. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Beaussart ML, Kaufman SB, Kaufman JC. Creative activity, personality, mental disease, and short-term mating success. J Creat Behav. 2012;46:151–67. [Google Scholar]

59. Beveridge A, Yorston G. I drink, therefore I am: Alcohol and inventiveness. J R Soc Med. 1999;92:646–8. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

sixty. Lowe G. Group differences in alcohol-creativity interactions. Psychol Rep. 1994;75:1635–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Pring L, Ryder Northward, Crane 50, Hermelin B. Creativity in savant artists with autism. Autism. 2012;16:45–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Campbell BC, Wang SS. Familial linkage between neuropsychiatric disorders and intellectual interests. PLoS I. 2012;7:e30405. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Indla 5, Pole R, Reddy I. Rockstar: A movie review. In: Athenaeum of Indian Psychiatry. Indian Psychiatric Society. (2nd ed) 2012;14:52–half dozen. [Google Scholar]

65. Somasundaram O. The seeds of creativity and the soil of poet Kannadasan. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53:82–6. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Pavitra KS, Chandrashekar CR, Choudhury P. Creativity and mental health: A profile of writers and musicians. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49:34–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

67. Kyaga S, Landén K, Boman M, Hultman CM, Långström N, Lichtenstein P, et al. Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-twelvemonth prospective total population study. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:83–xc. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

68. Flaherty AW. Brain disease and creativity: Mechanisms and treatment risks. Tin can J Psychiatry. 2011;56:132–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Sass LA. Schizophrenia, modernism, and the" creative imagination": On creativity and psychopathology. Creat Res J. 2001;13:55–74. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Periodical of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

delvecchiovoinficand.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102953/